home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.uni-c.dk!inet!perjac
- From: perjac@inet.uni-c.dk (Per Jacobsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: MUI 3.2
- Date: 6 Feb 1996 09:46:15 GMT
- Organization: The Shadows' Parking lot
- Message-ID: <4f7817$6h6@news.uni-c.dk>
- References: <3114e90f@karkis.canit.se> <2977.16T1418T25@canit.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: inet.uni-c.dk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Oskar Sundberg (gary@canit.se) wrote:
-
- > > Thank god for that, you really had me worried there...:) No, sorry about
- > >that. But what features BESIDES the configurability ARE you missing then?
-
- > Compared to standard gadtools? A _lot_. :) Now let me see, just the non-
- > programming stuff, then. ;) The GUI configuration is great, no need for silly
- > patches like urouhack/sysihack to get 1x1 gadget frames, the iconification,
- > that all the window positions are remembered if I want them to, the nice
- > sliders with the numeric info in the knob, the listviews with multiple
- > entries, the very nice keyboard control & gadget cycling, the listtree and
-
- But you sill can't close a requester with "enter" but have to hit "return"
-
- sigh
-
-
- > busy classes are very nice too, the XEN buttons are nice, the smooth scrolling
- > listviews are cool and so are the drag and drop objects.
-
- Don't forget when MUI scales a topaz 8 font to topaz 4 and makes the
- display unredable....
-
- > You might not, but you can't debate that it sells. Compare the standard W95
- > look with the standard AmigaOS WB, ugly buttons, Topaz-8 as standard, ugly 4
- > colour icons.
-
- Ugly is in the eye of the beholder. Besides some of us still use that you
- know!
-
-